Thursday, 20 June 2019   







Never see Ash'ariyyah in the same light, ever again! Aristotle of Stageira, Philo of Alexandria, Augustine of Hippo, the Sabeans of Harraan, the Mu'tazilites of Basrah and Baghdad and the Jahmite Ash'ari Heretics of Today Claiming Orthodoxy. Read the first article, the second article, the third article, the fourth article, the fifth article.
You are here: Home Sunni Answers
Jahmee Coward Abu Adam Naruiji Discreetly Acknowledges His Treachery in Quoting the Words of Ibn Taymiyyah But Adds A Few More Slanders Out of Resentment For Being Exposed
Posted by Abu.Iyaad, in Sunni Answers
Topics: Abu Adam Naruiji Abu Adam Naruji Jahmi Baleed 21st Century Kalam Atomist Abu Adam Naruiji Abu Adam Naruji Jahmi Baleed 21st Century Kalam Atomist

  Mail To Friend    Printer Friendly Bookmark and Share

In a previous lengthy article, we highlighted the treachery of a dimwitted Jahmee going by the name of Abu Adam Naruiji. After wallowing in the Tajseem, Hulool and Ittihaad of Christianity for most of his life, he now wallows in the ta'teel and Ilhaad of the Jahmites - from one extreme to the other - the whilst he poses as a follower of Abu Hasan al-Ash'ari (see here).

We provided a screenshot of the Jahmee Baleed quoting what he claims were the words of Ibn Taymiyyah, when in fact they were the words of ar-Raazee. Having scorned Ibn Taymiyyah for these few words, he should have in fact scorned ar-Raazee (an Imaam of the Ash'aris). So here is his original (treacherous) quotation:

We need to understand the nature of these Jahmites - they have electronic versions of the books of Ibn Taymiyyah, then they bring up the "Find" dialog box and stick in the word "jihah" or "hayyiz" or "munqasim" or "murakkab" and the likes and go fishing for quotes, for sentences which they can isolate and then claim, "Hey look, Ibn Taymiyyah says Allaah is a body" and the likes. Either this, or they just blindly follow others, quoting from them without verification. So the likes of these people are counterfeits, they are fakes and they are not genuine people with honest and genuine intentions to seek the truth. Genuine people find a quote, they read 10 pages before and 10 pages after, understand what the subject of the discussion is and be honest in their representation of the view of their opponent, so as not to lie upon him - but we are dealing with dimwitted Jahmees who are fakes and counterfeits as people, and who lack the most elementary and basic constituents of trustworthiness, honesty and integrity.

Now - (20th August 2009) - he has removed this original piece and replaced it with another in which he has discreetly updated the quote - and out of childish resentment, frustration and pettiness has decided to add five or six more slanders against Ibn Taymiyyah in the same article just to vent that anger and resentment ... why restrict yourself to one fraud in an article, when you can bring five or six to deceive people more convincingly? Makes sense (in the field of Jahmee Ethics).

We can see here that he is persisting upon his false reading and slander upon Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) and upon his battered, butchered and oppressed translation of the words of Ibn Taymiyyah. We clarified in the previous article that Ibn Taymiyyah's argument against ar-Raazee's argument can be summarized as follows:

I know what you are trying to do - you devise for certain terms meanings other than their established meanings in the language of the Qur'aan and in the language of the Arabs, then you incorporate them into those terms such as "tarkeeb", "inqisaam", "hayyiz", "jism", "jihah", "ghayr", "iftiqaar", and you use this as a route to deny what Allaah has affirmed for Himself, such as Him being above the Throne. So by way of example, Allaah being above the Throne is a correct and true meaning established in the Book, the Sunnah, and the Ijmaa' of the Salaf, and affirmed by the Early Ash'aris, as well as many other factions. Then you take this correct meaning and enter it under the term "jihah" or "makaan". Then you propound those meanings represented by these terms that are rightfully denied for Allaah, such as being confined by space - and then you negate the term as a whole, saying "we must negate jihah or makaan for Allaah" and through this you negate both the false meaning (Allaah being confined etc.) and the true meaning (Allaah being above the Throne) which you deceptively entered into the term.

And with respect to what you claim is "tarkeeb" with the meaning you have devised, then it does not matter what you call it, what you actually intend to deny is something that all factions must accept (Philosophers, Jahmites, Mu'tazilites, Ash'arites, and the people of the Sunnah) - which is that every existing thing has attributes which it is characterized by and as such there must be a notion of distinction (imtiyaaz) and otherness (ghayr) affirmed, otherwise it would mean the abolition of every existing thing and rendering it's existence impossible. So you (ar-Raazee) have not provided any proof for the impossibility of this, which you have deceptively labeled as tarkeeb. And in your attempt to reject Allaah being above the Throne you are merely using the same argument on the basis of your philosophical ramblings and your false necessities which you fabricated in your own mind and which none of those who affirm Allaah is above the Throne - including the Early Ash'aris - ever spoke with or claimed.

And in addition to this, the Philosophers use this same argument against you, since you affirm the attributes (life, hearing, seeing, will, speech, power, knowledge) and as they are "distinct" and "other" with respect to each other, then you have affirmed Allaah is murakkab (composed) because you have affirmed the notion of "distinction" and "otherness" with respect to Allaah's Essence. So if this proof of yours is correct, then it necessitates that you have spoken of Allaah being composite (murakkab) and the Philosophers are correct in their refutation of you, and if this proof is false, then its use by you is invalidated.

And as for the established, known meanings of the likes of "at-tarkeeb", "al-inqisaam" in the language of the Qur'aan and the language of the Arabs then they are negated for Allaah, and they are impossible for Allaah due to His being "as-Samad" and exalted and lofty is Allaah from being described with such meanings of falsehood - and this is what we say textually, unequivocally.

As for what we reject from you, then it is in fact the foundation of all of you Mu'attilah (the Philosophers, Jahmites, Mu'tazilites, Ash'arites) which is that you devise meanings for terms by which you intend to negate for Allaah what He affirmed for Himself, and amongst yourselves you refute each other and accuse each other of the same (tarkeeb) that you accuse us with. Thus, the Philosophers, Jahmites and Mu'tazilites accuse you of being Mujassimah and of declaring Allaah to be composite because you have affirmed the notion of "distinction" and "imtiyaaz" by affirming seven attributes for Allaah's Essence. And you in turn attempt to apply the same deceptive language in trying to negate Allaah being above the Throne and to negate whatever does not concord with what you made to be the foundation of your religion - "hudooth ul-ajsaam".

And not a single one of those affirming that Allaah is above the Throne ever spoke with or affirmed what your mind has fabricated of forsaken, dark and corrupt thoughts which are:

If Allaah is above the Throne, the Throne is mighty, so Allaah is Mighty, and since the Throne's left is other than its right, it must mean that the same applies to Allaah, and this means Allaah is divisible, and therefore composed, and as this is impossible for Allaah, He therefore cannot be above the Throne.

So these are the inventions, fabrications and corrupt thoughts of your minds, they are not the thoughts, reasoning or beliefs of those who affirm what Allaah affirmed for Himself -and then you deceptively and fraudulently try to fabricate this way of thinking upon them - claiming they speak with it - free and innocent are they of your slanders - rather these are the corrupt necessities arising in your minds from what you have made to be the foundation of your religion - which is al-Jawhar al-Fard (the indivisibile particle) and hudooth ul-ajsaam (the proof of createdness of bodies) - and they are not the necessities of what Allaah has revealed concerning Himself.

Despite this, it is clear that the Jahmee Baleed is adamant in passing judgement upon himself through his actions - that he is an unscrupulous, deceiving, surmising, counterfeit pretender who after being exposed and refuted, persists in his falsehoods and slanders.

Ibn Taymiyyah Says That the Meanings of Taba''ud, Tajazzee, and inqisaam (Meanings of Divisibility) Are Impossible For Allaah Because He is al-Ahad, as-Samad

Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah said in the "Bayaan" (3/466)

Which translates as:

So it has become apparent that His Name al-Ahad necessitates declaring Him free of what is obligatory to negate from Him of at-tashbeeh (resemblance) and al-mumaathalah (likeness) with those other than Him in anything from amongst the things. And His Name as-Samad necessitates declaring Him free of what is obligatory to negate from Him of al-inqisaam (divisibility) and at-tafarruq (splitting, separation) and what is similar to that, from what negates the perfection of His Samadiyyah, Sublime and Exalted is Allaah from what the oppressors say (about Him) with a great and lofty exaltation.

And he also said in the "Bayaan" (3/128-130):

Which translates as:

When it becomes known that the intent of the leading (scholars) behind this saying of negating at-tajazzee and al-inqisaam (both meanings of divisibility) is not the [meaning] of the presence of divisibility (al-inqisaam) where part of Him separates from another part, and nor the possibility (imkaan) of that (applying to Him) - even if the word regarding that is more apparent than that in others - for they do not intend by the generality of their terminological words that which is well-known in the language of their meaning. Rather, they are meanings they have claimed specifically by [their] speech regarding them, either in negation, or affirmation. This is why Imaam Ahmad said about them, "They speak with the ambiguous of speech, and they deceive the ignorant people on account of the doubts they place over them".

And these two meanings (of at-tajazzee and al-inqisaam, divisibility) are from those [meanings] that the Muslims are agreed upon that Allaah should be purified and sanctified from, for indeed Allaah, the Sublime, is "Ahad" and "Samad", He does not separate into parts (yatajazzee, yataba''ad) and is not divisible (munqasim) with the meaning that part of Him separates from another (part) just like a divided, split-up body is separated - like what is divided of the connected bodies, such as bread, meat and clothing and so on. A part of Him does not separate (from Him) like what separates from the hayawaan (animate, mammals) of its superfluities. And He (Allaah) is purified of such meanings with the meaning that they are non-existent (regarding Him) and are impossible for Him. Thus, His Essence does not accept tafreeq or tab'eed (meanings of division, separation). Rather, He is not ajwaf (i.e. have an interior like humans do) as has been said by the Companions and the Taab'ioon in explanation of [the meaning of] as-Samad, that "He is the one without a jawf (interior)", whose explanation will shortly follow.

And the majority of people do not understand from the negation of at-tab'eed, at-tajzi'ah, al-inqisaam, and at-tarkeeb (all meanings of divisibility, separability and composition) except these two meanings and their likes.

And the negation of that (for Allaah) is united upon between the Muslims except, O Allaah, that there may be some misguided ignoramuses whom I do not know about who have permitted (the like of these meanings) for Allaah, that part of Him separates from another part, as has been quoted from some of the Disbelievers. It is not possible to encompass what the offspring of Aadam speak with, but what it is intended here that [of] those positions that are quoted from the [various] factions of the Ummah, I did not find amongst them this saying (i.e. of Allaah being divisible with this meaning) from any of those factions.

And this is just an example of the kind of very explicit negation and denial by Ibn Taymiyyah that Allaah, the Sublime, is divisible (munqasim) or composite (murakkab).

So the Jahmee Baleed is a witness against himself by his own actions that the truth is not of any interest to him, nor is it of any interest to actually understand the view and opinion of his opponent and nor to fear Allaah with respect to quoting and ascribing views to others - rather the only interest of the Jahmee Baleed is to give victory to the (inherited Greek) philosophies of the pseudo-Sabean Pagans and the creeds of al-Jahm bin Safwaan and al-Ja'd bin Dirham over the Book of Allaah, the Sunnah of His Messenger and that which the Salaf were upon - from the greatest of their slogans being "there is no deity above the Throne".


Link to this article:   Show: HTML LinkFull LinkShort Link
Share or Bookmark this page: You will need to have an account with the selected service in order to post links or bookmark this page.

                 
  
Subscribe via RSS or email:
Follow us through RSS or email. Click the RSS icon to subscribe to our feed.

     

Related Articles:
Add a Comment
You must be registered and logged in to comment.





Don't Be Deceived By the Terminology of the Jahmiyyah!
(Introduction) (al-jism) (al-'arad) (Hulul al-hawaadith) (al-tarkib
)

Series View More...

Topics
Basics
Scholars
History
Misconceptions
Ibn Taymiyyah
Articles
Sunni Answers
Audio
The Clinic

Latest Articles
The History and Origins of the Kalam Theology of the Asharis and Maturidis
Revelation, Philosophy and Kalam: The Creed of the Salaf Versus the Creed of the Asharis and Maturidis
The Creed of the Kullabi Asharis Preview: Part 11 - Concerning the Affirmation and Negation of Al-Hadd and the Doubts of the Jahmites
The Divine Attributes: The Righteous Salaf vs the Heretical Kalam Schools - Part 2: Which Door Did the Ash'aris and Maturidis Come Through?
The Divine Attributes: The Righteous Salaf vs the Heretical Kalam Schools - Part 1: Introduction
The Saying of the Salaf (منه بدأ وإليه يعود), Imaam Al-Tahawi's Uncreated Single Qur'an and Sa'eed Foudah's Two Qur'an Doctrine: Part 3
The Saying of the Salaf (منه بدأ وإليه يعود), Imaam Al-Tahawi's Uncreated Single Qur'an and Sa'eed Foudah's Two Qur'an Doctrine: Part 2
The Saying of the Salaf (منه بدأ وإليه يعود), Imaam Al-Tahawi's Uncreated Single Qur'an and Sa'eed Foudah's Two Qur'an Doctrine: Part 1
Another Dishonest and Resentful Jahmite (Nizar Hammadi) Trying to Malign Ibn Taymiyyah: Regarding Fakhr Al-Din Al-Razi's Confusion
Deconstructing the Micro Madrasa (Of Ilm Al-Kalaam and Tajahhum) of Ibrahim Osi-Efa (Liverpool, UK): Part 4

Pages
No pages found.

Most Popular
Destroying the Slander of Tajsim (Anthropomorphism) Against Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah: Part 1 - Developing The Framework
Ibn Taymiyyah Compared With the Philosophers: Exposing Abu Adam al-Naruiji's Academic Fraud - Part 5: Ahl al-Sunnah, the Philosophers and Ahl al-Kalaam on Allaah's Actions and Origins of the Universe - Continued...
Aristotle of Stageira, Philo of Alexandria, Augustine of Hippo, the Sabeans of Harraan, the Mu'tazilites of Basrah and Baghdad and the Jahmite Ash'ari Heretics of Today Claiming Orthodoxy- Part 1
Ibn Taymiyyah Compared With the Philosophers: Exposing Abu Adam al-Naruiji's Academic Fraud - Part 4: Ahl al-Sunnah, the Philosophers and Ahl al-Kalaam on Allaah's Actions and Origins of the Universe
The American Chestnut Tree, The Willow Tree, Jahm Bin Safwan, The Mu'tazilah, Ibn Kullaab and the Early and Later Ash'aris - An Illustration
Abu Hamid al-Ghazali (Imaam of the Later Ash'aris): If the Prophet Invited to Belief in Allaah Through the Language and Terminology of the Ash'arites, Not even One in a Thousand Would Accept It! Rather the Majority Would Tend to Atheism!
Destroying the Slander of Tajsim (Anthropomorphism) Against Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah: Part 2 - Ahl al-Sunnah, Ibn Kullab, al-Ash'ari and the Early Kullabis, Ash'aris
Destroying the Slander of Tajsim (Anthropomorphism) Against Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah: Part 3 - The Mu'attilah and Mujassimah Share the Same Base and Foundation For Their Ta'teel and Tajseem
Undercover Ash'aris: Understanding The Intellectual Fraud Needed by Today's Ash'aris To Prop Up and Defend their (Neo-Jahmite) Creed: Analysis of a Sample of Marifah Apologeticism Regarding Distinction Between the Attributes - Part 1
Destroying the Slander of Tajsim (Anthropomorphism) Against Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah: Part 9 - The Accusation of Tajsim and Tashbih Against al-Qadi Abu Ya'laa al-Hanbali

Archives (View more)
2018 • January
2017 • December
2014 • December
2013 • November
2013 • October
2013 • September
2013 • August
2013 • July
2013 • June
2011 • October
2011 • September
2011 • August


Key Topics
21st century kalam atomistabdullaah ibn al-mubaarakabdullah ali al-aminabdul-qadir al-jeelaaneeabdul-qadir al-jilaniabu abdullah bin hamidabu adam al-naruijiabu adam naruijiabu adam narujiabu al-abbas al-qalanisiabu al-hasan bin al-zaghuniabu al-hudhayl al-allaafabu ali al-ahwaziabu bakr al-baqillaniabu bakr al-ismaa'eeleeabu bakr al-isma'iliabu bilal malikiabu fadl al-tamimiabu hamid al-ghazaliabu hanifahabu hasan al-ash'ariabu isma'il al-harawiabu layth bin ataaabu mansur al-baghdadiabu ya'laaabul-hasan ibn mahdi at-tabariaccidentadh-dhahabeeadh-dhahabiaf'aal ikhtiyaariyyahahl al-kalaamahl al-kalamahmad bin sinan al-waasiteeahmed cobraakhbaar ul-aahaadal-aamideeal-akhtalal-amidial-'aradal-arshal-ash'areeal-asharial-ash'arial-baqillanial-bayhaqial-bukhaareeal-dhahabial-ghazalial-haddal-hawaadithal-ibanahal-istiwaaal-jahm bin safwanal-jawhar al-fardal-jihahal-jismal-juwayneeal-juwaynial-kawthareeal-khateeb al-baghdaadeeal-khatib al-baghdadiallaah's angerallaah's namesallaah's pleasureal-milal wan-nihalal-muhasibial-naruijial-nawaweeal-nawawial-qadi abd al-wahhab al-malikial-qadi abu ya'laaal-qalanisial-qurtubeeal-qurtubial-qushayrial-razial-shahrastanial-tabyinal-taftazanial-tahawial-tarkibal-uluwwal-uluwwwal-wajhal-yadan-nadhr al-istidlaalan-nawawianthropomorphismanthropomorphistsa'raad'aradaristotelian metaphysicsaristotelians anonymousaristotlear-raziarshasaas ut-taqdisashareesash'areesash'ariash'ari burnoutashari scholarsash'ari scholarsasharisash'ariteash'aritesash'ariyyahasmaaasrar rasheedasrar rashidas-sanusiatabek shukrov nasafiatheismatomismat-tabariat-tirmidheeaugustineaydinbaqillanibarelwibayaan talbees al-jahmiyyahbayjooribayjuribelief sciencebetter ash'aribi dhatihibishr al-mareesibucket theologycompetition cornercompositeday of arafahdemocritusdetoxdivisibleearly asharisearly ash'ariseesaaencompassmentfake hanbalisfakhr al-din al-razifakhr ud-din ar-razifalaasifahfalsafahfaqirfawqiyyahforty hadithgf haddadghadabgrave worshipgreek philosophershaadithhaashiyahhanbalisharfharranhellenismhishaamiyyahhizb ut-tahrirhudoothhudooth ul-ajsaamhuloolhulul al-hawadithibn abi zayd al-qayrawaniibn al-mutahhiribn asaakiribn asakiribn battahibn darbasibn fawrakibn hajribn hajr al-asqalaniibn jareer at-tabariibn jarir al-tabariibn khuzaymahibn kullaabibn kullabibn mahdi al-tabariibn seenaibn sinaibn taymiyyahibrahim osi-efaidol worshipihaatahilm al-kalaamilm al-kalamilm ul-kalamimaam adh-dhahabiimaam ahmadimaam ahmad bin hanbalimaam ash-shaafi'eeimam malikinqisaamintercessionintoxicationistidlaalistiwaaithbaatittihaadityaanjahm bin safwaanjahm bin safwanjahmee baleedjahmeespeakjahmi baleedjahmitejahmite ash'arisjahmitesjahmiyyahjahmiyyah mu'tazilahjawharjawharahjawharat ut-tawhidjihahjismjismiyyahkalaamkalaam nafseekalaam nafsikalam atomismkalam nafsikarraamiyyahkhabar ul-waahidkullaabi ash'ariskullaabiyyahkullabi asharislafdhiyyahlater ash'arisliquormarifahmetaphysicsmicro madrasamuhammad abduhmuhammad anwar shah al-kashmirimuhammad fahmimuhammad sa'eed ramadan al-butimuhdathmujassimahmurakkabmushabbihahmutafalsifahmutakallimoonmu'tazilahnadhrnaqd al-tadmuriyyahnaruijinaseehah dhahabiyyahneo-hanbalisneo-platonismnihaayat ul-iqdaamnizar hammadinuh ha mim kellernuh kellernur uz zamaan institutenuzoolpersonal developmentphiladelphian jahmite ash'arisphiladelphian jahmitesphilophilosophersplatopseudo-hanbalisqadi abdul-jabbarquraanquranqu'ranqur'anqur'an creationistsridhaariyadh al-saaliheenrizqullah al-tamimisaalimiyyahsabeanssaeed foudahsaeed foudah sa'id foudahsaint worshipsalafiyyahsawtsayyid qutbseeking ilmself awarenessself helpshafaa'ahshahrastaanishahrastanisifaatsifaat dhaatiyyahsifaat fi'liyyahsifat fi'liyyahsifat khabariyyahsubstancesumaniyyahtabyin kadhib al-muftaritafweedtaj al-din al-subkitajseemtajsimtakaafu' al-adillahtakyeeftamtheeltaqi ad-din an-nabahanitaqiuddin al-nabhanitarkeebtashbeehta'teelta'weeltawhidtawhid al-ibaadahtawhid al-ibadahtawhid al-uloohiyyahtawhid al-uluhiyyahta'wilthe clinicthe quranthe thronetheologiansthomas aquinasthronetop tipsuluwwundercover ash'arisvoicewahhabiwahhabisyahyaa bin ammaaryusuf al-qaradawiyusuf an-nabahani
Copyright © 2019 . All rights reserved. RSSTagsPrivacyLegal and Terms of UseSitemap