Friday, 15 December 2017   







Never see Ash'ariyyah in the same light, ever again! Aristotle of Stageira, Philo of Alexandria, Augustine of Hippo, the Sabeans of Harraan, the Mu'tazilites of Basrah and Baghdad and the Jahmite Ash'ari Heretics of Today Claiming Orthodoxy. Read the first article, the second article, the third article, the fourth article, the fifth article.
You are here: Home Basics
The Criterion For Considering a Scholar to Be an 'Ash'ari' And the Deceptive Long Lists of 'Ash'ari' Scholars Being Spread by Contemporary (Jahmite) Ash'aris
Posted by Abu.Iyaad, in Basics
Topics: Ash'ari Scholars Ashari Scholars Ash'ari Scholars Ashari Scholars

  Mail To Friend    Printer Friendly Bookmark and Share

Introduction

Many people will be familiar with the long lists of 'Ash'ari' scholars that are presented on websites, blogs and forums to argue that since all these scholars were 'Ash'aris', then as they claim through the tongue of disposition - how can the Ash'ari creed possibly be fallible or anything from it to be erroneous when it is (supposedly) the very creed (in all its foundations and branches) that Allaah actually revealed upon the Prophet and His Companions 250 years before Abu al-Hasan al-Ash'ari (d. 324H, rahimahullaah) was even born, and 300 years before he had even abandoned the Mu'tazilah and adopted the creed of the followers of Ibn Kullaab al-Qattaan al-Basri (d. 240H) - and that in light of this how can it contain a single shred of error?

And this is their intent behind compiling and spreading such lists to deceive people - and they resort to this practice out of seeking psychological comfort after they are unable to respond to the hujjah (proof) and the bayaan (clarification) that comes (from the Salaf) in demonstrating their creed to be but an aberration, a mere extension derived from the same usool (foundations) of the Mu'tazilah in reality.

So what about the hundreds of Scholars that could be compiled into lists from before 400H, and who decisively refuted the Jahmiyyah and Mu'tazilah before the Ash'arites were even known of as a faction? Were all those scholars ignorant of the true creed and did they fail to propound it, explain it, defend it, and write about it at all. And this, despite the fact that the main period in which the Jahmiyyah and more so the Mu'tazilah had strength and vigour was 200 years before even a single name appears on these huge lists of "Ash'ari" Scholars?

  • And was their creed the creed of the Ash'aris regarding the Qur'an, that this Qur'an we have, in letter word, recited, heard and memorized is created, and that there are two Qur'ans one which is created and which is not?

  • And was their creed the creed of the Ash'aris regarding the reality of Eemaan (it is tasdeeq only) which is barely different from the creed of the Jahmiyyah (it is ma'rifah only)?

  • And was their creed regarding Allah that He is "neither within the creation nor outside of it" - which is the creed that the Ash'aris took from the Philosophers like Ibn Sina (d. 429H) - see here - and the Jahmiyyah and Mu'tazilah?

  • And was their creed to use the Metaphysics of the Greek and atheist Philosophers (al-jawhar wal-'arad and Aristotle's al-Maqoolaat al-Ashar, the Ten Categories) to devise a [corrupt] rational argument to prove the universe, made up of ajsaam (bodies) is created, then to make this the very foundation of the religion itself without which a person is sinful (or in the view of al-Juwaynee d. 478H, a kaafir - see proof here), when Allaah has in fact endued each soul with the innate instinctive disposition to affirm a supreme creator?

  • And was their creed to disdain the ahaadeeth and reject them in matters of creed because they are "aahaad" and to treat the proof of the intellect as definitive and decisive over the revealed texts, as is found explicitly in the books of the Ash'aris?

So we can see that these long lists are simply attempts at intellectual fraud whose real aims are:

  • To impute ignorance to the entirety of the Salaf prior to 400H

  • To argue by way of the "majority" - that the "majority" is right - and this is in opposition to the Book and the Sunnah.

  • To deceive the people after they have been unable to answer the unanswerable objections to the glaring discrepancies in their creed which are mostly attempts to camouflage what is in many respects a Mu'tazili creed - (even if they oppose the Mu'tazilah on certain issues) - disguised with the use of innovated terms and phrases to give the illusion that it opposes the creed of the Mu'tazilah and is in fact the creed of Ahl us-Sunnah - perfect example is their creed on "Kalaam Nafsee" and the Qur'an. To put the Kullaabi-derived, Ash'arite creed in perspective, you may want to take a look at the American Chestnut Tree in this article.

So it is necessary to lay down some rules or criteria through which these lists can be evaluated and purged, for the purpose of:

  • Correcting their improper attributions of Ash'ariyyah to certain scholars (such as al-Khateeb al-Baghdadi and Ibn Qudaamah al-Maqdisi and others)

  • Defending the honor and belief of such scholars from such imputations

So before discussing such rules and criteria, an important clarification is necessary as to why we repeatedly refer to today's Ash'aris as "Jahmites":

Laying Down the Criterion

So when you get slapped with a big long list of alleged "Ash'ari" Scholars, then the following evidence should be requested as a validation of the claim for each and every scholar:

Explicit Propounding and Validating Of the Usool

Many of the Scholars on these alleged lists have never textually or verbally claimed to be "Ash'ari" or even formally identified themselves with the Ash'ari madhhab, and thus, in the absence of that, we need to apply a just and fair criterion which is outlined below. And when you apply this, you will see the list starting to dwindle. Just because a Scholar made one or many instances of ta'weel, or concurred with the Ash'arites in some affairs of creed, does not make him an "Ash'ari" and it is not a proof of such either.

Here is how you apply this criterion. First go to all the standard Ash'arite textbooks:

  • The books of al-Baqillani (d. 403H), "at-Tamheed" and "al-Insaaf"
  • The book of Abdul-Qahir (Abu Mansur) al-Baghdadi (d. 429H), "Usool ud-Deen"
  • "al-Ghunyah Fee Usool ud-Deen" of Abu Sa'd an-Neesabooree (d. 478H)
  • "ash-Shaamil Fee Usool ud-Deen", of al-Juwaynee (d. 478H)
  • "al-Irshaad" of al-Juwaynee (d. 478H)
  • "Lum' al-Adillah" of Abdul Malik al-Juwaynee (d. 478H)
  • "al-Iqtisad fil-I'tiqaad" of al-Ghazali (d. 505H)
  • "Nihayat ul-Aqdaam" of ash-Shahrastani (d. 548H)
  • "Mahsul Afkaar il-Mutaqaddimeen wal-Muta'akhkhireen" of ar-Raazee (d. 606H)
  • "al-Arba'een fee Usool ud-Deen" of ar-Raazee (d. 606H)
  • "Asaas ut-Taqdees" of ar-Raazee (d. 606H)
  • "Ma'aalim Usool ud-Deen" of ar-Raazee (d. 606H)
  • "al-Mawaaqif" of al-Eejee (d. 756H)

Then extract all the usool that are laid down in these books which are the foundation and fabric of the positions in creed of the Ash'arites.

So as some examples:

  • Al-Jawhar wal-Arad: Use of the Metaphysics of the atheist Philosophers such as al-jawhar, al-'arad, Aristotle's "al-Maqoolaat al-Ashar" (the Ten Categories) - and making this the base and foundation for proving Allaah's existence, and making this to be the ultimate truth upon which the actual veracity of the religion itself depends - this is called "hudooth ul-a'raad fil-ajsaam", or "hudooth ul-ajsaam".

  • Al-Jawhar al-Fard (Atomism): Use of what the Mu'tazilah incorporated into the proof of "hudooth ul-ajsaam" in order to refine the argument a bit more and to lay down the argument for the possibility and plausibility of resurrection.

  • An-Nadhar wal-Istidlaal: Making inspection and inference (an-nadhar wal-istidlaal) to be the first obligation upon each and every individual reaching the age of responsibility (mukallaf), and considering him a blameworthy muqallid, sinner or a kaafir (view of al-Juwaynee, d,478H in "ash-Shaamil Fee Usool id-Deen") if he did not do so, whilst having had the ability and thereafter died.

  • The Proof of Intellect is Superior to Proof of Revelation: That the proof of the intellect (al-aql) is decisive and definitive over the revealed texts (an-naql), that the intellect leads and guides, and the revealed texts follow - as is found in their books, such as those of al-Bagdhadi (d. 429H), al-Juwaynee (d. 478H), al-Ghazali (d. 505H), ar-Razi (d. 606H) and others.

  • Khabar ul-Waahid: That the akhbaar ul-aahaad (solitary narrations) amount only to speculative knowledge, speculative in terms of whether they are authentic or not, and speculative in terms of their meaning and indication - and rejection of these narrations in affairs of creed.

  • The Reality of Eemaan: That faith (eemaan) is only tasdeeq (assent of the heart) and actions are not from eemaan, and this view of theirs is based upon their belief in "Kalaam Nafsee", that speech (Kalaam) is the meaning (ma'naa) that subsists in the self, exclusive to the word (lafdh) - and not a combination of the meaning and wording. Based upon this, when it is said by them that , "Imaan is belief and speech" - then as speech (kalaam, qawl etc.) to them is the meaning that exists in the self, or soul, exclusive to the expressed word, then faith (eemaan) remains what is just in the heart (of belief) and speech (i.e. in the self, soul). And this is viewpoint is based upon usool they have laid down and built their madhhab upon.

  • Obligation of Ta'weel: That it is waajib (obligatory) when faced with a text that gives a presumption of tashbeeh to make ta'weel of tafweed. Note here their saying that it is a must to do so, it is obligatory to do so - and though many Scholars felt into something of ta'weel, it does not mean that they held it obligatory to make ta'weel - as is from the usool of the Ash'arites.

  • The Tawheed of the Messengers: That Tawheed is "There is no creator besides Allaah", and that the Tawheed that the Messengers called to is to negate divisibility (inqisaam, tajzi'ah), numerousness (kathrah, ta'addud), and composition (tarkeeb) from Allaah's Essence (based upon the notions, language and terminology of the atheist Philosophers - jawhar, jism 'arad and so on)

  • There is no Qur'an on this Earth: Based upon their view that Allaah does not speak according to His Will and Power and that His speech is only a single meaning present with His Self from eternity (Kalaam Nafsee), then this means that what we have with us of the recited, memorized, heard, written Qur'an is not the real Qur'an it is only a created expression of that - since Allaah never spoke with letters and words. And thus what everyone is worshipping Allaah with, is not Allaah's speech in reality, it is just something created.

So these are just some examples, there are many more usool that are the fabric of the Ash'arite creed. So once we have this list we need to verify and demand an answer,

This particular scholar that you have imputed with Ash'ariyyah, please establish for us that he propounded and validated these usool which are from the essence of the Ash'arite creed, its very framework and foundation, and its core, and that he agreed with them all, and then built his creed upon this framework, arguing for it, defending it, and inviting to it.

And when you demand this, you will see these people fling their wares in their bags and flee on their heels with their tails in between their legs and the list will become shortened and will be seen for what it is - spurious. This is because these people are relying upon people's ignorance of what specifically defines what is "Ash'ariyyah" - and the only way to know that is to gather all their books together and extract all the the usool that would make someone an Ash'ari.

Clarification Regarding the Ascription of Ash'ariyyah To Specific Scholars

To follow inshaa'Allaah - clarifications regarding the likes of al-Khateeb al-Baghdaadee, Abu Uthmaan as-Saaboonee, Ibn Qudaamah al-Maqdisee, Ibn al-Jawzee, al-Mizzi, adh-Dhahabee and others who are included in these spurious lists.


Link to this article:   Show: HTML LinkFull LinkShort Link
Share or Bookmark this page: You will need to have an account with the selected service in order to post links or bookmark this page.

                 
  
Subscribe via RSS or email:
Follow us through RSS or email. Click the RSS icon to subscribe to our feed.

     

Related Articles:
Add a Comment
You must be registered and logged in to comment.





Don't Be Deceived By the Terminology of the Jahmiyyah!
(Introduction) (al-jism) (al-'arad) (Hulul al-hawaadith) (al-tarkib
)

Series View More...

Topics
Basics
Scholars
History
Misconceptions
Ibn Taymiyyah
Articles
Sunni Answers
Audio
The Clinic

Latest Articles
The Divine Attributes: The Righteous Salaf vs the Heretical Kalam Schools - Part 2: Which Door Did the Ash'aris and Maturidis Come Through?
The Divine Attributes: The Righteous Salaf vs the Heretical Kalam Schools - Part 1: Introduction
The Saying of the Salaf (منه بدأ وإليه يعود), Imaam Al-Tahawi's Uncreated Single Qur'an and Sa'eed Foudah's Two Qur'an Doctrine: Part 3
The Saying of the Salaf (منه بدأ وإليه يعود), Imaam Al-Tahawi's Uncreated Single Qur'an and Sa'eed Foudah's Two Qur'an Doctrine: Part 2
The Saying of the Salaf (منه بدأ وإليه يعود), Imaam Al-Tahawi's Uncreated Single Qur'an and Sa'eed Foudah's Two Qur'an Doctrine: Part 1
Another Dishonest and Resentful Jahmite (Nizar Hammadi) Trying to Malign Ibn Taymiyyah: Regarding Fakhr Al-Din Al-Razi's Confusion
Deconstructing the Micro Madrasa (Of Ilm Al-Kalaam and Tajahhum) of Ibrahim Osi-Efa (Liverpool, UK): Part 4
Abd Al-Kareem Al-Shahrastani (d. 548H) Explains the Tawheed of the Messengers - 'Wahhabism' in 6th Century Khurasan
Cunning Rafidee Ibn Al-Mutahhir Mocks the Intellects of the Ash'aris, Ibn Taymiyyah Puts the Donkey in His Place
Deconstructing the Micro Madrasa (Of Ilm Al-Kalaam and Tajahhum) of Ibrahim Osi-Efa (Liverpool, UK): Part 3

Pages
No pages found.

Most Popular
Destroying the Slander of Tajsim (Anthropomorphism) Against Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah: Part 1 - Developing The Framework
Ibn Taymiyyah Compared With the Philosophers: Exposing Abu Adam al-Naruiji's Academic Fraud - Part 5: Ahl al-Sunnah, the Philosophers and Ahl al-Kalaam on Allaah's Actions and Origins of the Universe - Continued...
Aristotle of Stageira, Philo of Alexandria, Augustine of Hippo, the Sabeans of Harraan, the Mu'tazilites of Basrah and Baghdad and the Jahmite Ash'ari Heretics of Today Claiming Orthodoxy- Part 1
Ibn Taymiyyah Compared With the Philosophers: Exposing Abu Adam al-Naruiji's Academic Fraud - Part 4: Ahl al-Sunnah, the Philosophers and Ahl al-Kalaam on Allaah's Actions and Origins of the Universe
The American Chestnut Tree, The Willow Tree, Jahm Bin Safwan, The Mu'tazilah, Ibn Kullaab and the Early and Later Ash'aris - An Illustration
Destroying the Slander of Tajsim (Anthropomorphism) Against Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah: Part 2 - Ahl al-Sunnah, Ibn Kullab, al-Ash'ari and the Early Kullabis, Ash'aris
Destroying the Slander of Tajsim (Anthropomorphism) Against Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah: Part 3 - The Mu'attilah and Mujassimah Share the Same Base and Foundation For Their Ta'teel and Tajseem
Undercover Ash'aris: Understanding The Intellectual Fraud Needed by Today's Ash'aris To Prop Up and Defend their (Neo-Jahmite) Creed: Analysis of a Sample of Marifah Apologeticism Regarding Distinction Between the Attributes - Part 1
Destroying the Slander of Tajsim (Anthropomorphism) Against Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah: Part 9 - The Accusation of Tajsim and Tashbih Against al-Qadi Abu Ya'laa al-Hanbali
Destroying the Slander of Tajsim (Anthropomorphism) Against Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah: Part 8 - An Eleven Point Summary of What Has Preceded So Far

Archives (View more)
2014 • December
2013 • November
2013 • October
2013 • September
2013 • August
2013 • July
2013 • June
2011 • October
2011 • September
2011 • August
2011 • April
2011 • January


Key Topics
21st century kalam atomistabdullaah ibn al-mubaarakabdullah ali al-aminabdul-qadir al-jeelaaneeabdul-qadir al-jilaniabu abdullah bin hamidabu adam al-naruijiabu adam naruijiabu adam narujiabu al-abbas al-qalanisiabu al-hasan bin al-zaghuniabu al-hudhayl al-allaafabu ali al-ahwaziabu bakr al-baqillaniabu bakr al-ismaa'eeleeabu bakr al-isma'iliabu bilal malikiabu fadl al-tamimiabu hamid al-ghazaliabu hanifahabu hasan al-ash'ariabu isma'il al-harawiabu layth bin ataaabu mansur al-baghdadiabu ya'laaabul-hasan ibn mahdi at-tabariaccidentadh-dhahabeeadh-dhahabiaf'aal ikhtiyaariyyahahl al-kalaamahl al-kalamahmad bin sinan al-waasiteeahmed cobraakhbaar ul-aahaadal-aamideeal-akhtalal-amidial-'aradal-arshal-ash'areeal-asharial-ash'arial-baqillanial-bayhaqial-bukhaareeal-dhahabial-ghazalial-haddal-hawaadithal-ibanahal-istiwaaal-jahm bin safwanal-jawhar al-fardal-jihahal-jismal-juwayneeal-juwaynial-kawthareeal-khateeb al-baghdaadeeal-khatib al-baghdadiallaah's angerallaah's namesallaah's pleasureal-milal wan-nihalal-muhasibial-naruijial-nawaweeal-nawawial-qadi abd al-wahhab al-malikial-qadi abu ya'laaal-qalanisial-qurtubeeal-qurtubial-qushayrial-razial-shahrastanial-tabyinal-taftazanial-tahawial-tarkibal-uluwwal-uluwwwal-wajhal-yadan-nadhr al-istidlaalan-nawawianthropomorphismanthropomorphistsa'raad'aradaristotelian metaphysicsaristotelians anonymousaristotlear-raziarshasaas ut-taqdisashareesash'areesash'ariash'ari burnoutashari scholarsash'ari scholarsasharisash'ariteash'aritesash'ariyyahasmaaasrar rasheedasrar rashidas-sanusiatabek shukrov nasafiatheismatomismat-tabariat-tirmidheeaugustineaydinbaqillanibarelwibayaan talbees al-jahmiyyahbayjooribayjuribelief sciencebetter ash'aribi dhatihibishr al-mareesibucket theologycompetition cornercompositeday of arafahdemocritusdetoxdivisibleearly asharisearly ash'ariseesaaencompassmentfake hanbalisfakhr al-din al-razifakhr ud-din ar-razifalaasifahfalsafahfaqirfawqiyyahforty hadithgf haddadghadabgrave worshipgreek philosophershaadithhaashiyahhanbalisharfharranhellenismhishaamiyyahhizb ut-tahrirhudoothhudooth ul-ajsaamhuloolhulul al-hawadithibn abi zayd al-qayrawaniibn al-mutahhiribn asaakiribn asakiribn battahibn darbasibn fawrakibn hajribn hajr al-asqalaniibn jareer at-tabariibn jarir al-tabariibn khuzaymahibn kullaabibn kullabibn mahdi al-tabariibn seenaibn sinaibn taymiyyahibrahim osi-efaidol worshipihaatahilm al-kalaamilm al-kalamilm ul-kalamimaam adh-dhahabiimaam ahmadimaam ahmad bin hanbalimaam ash-shaafi'eeimam malikinqisaamintercessionintoxicationistidlaalistiwaaithbaatittihaadityaanjahm bin safwaanjahm bin safwanjahmee baleedjahmeespeakjahmi baleedjahmitejahmite ash'arisjahmitesjahmiyyahjahmiyyah mu'tazilahjawharjawharahjawharat ut-tawhidjihahjismjismiyyahkalaamkalaam nafseekalaam nafsikalam atomismkalam nafsikarraamiyyahkhabar ul-waahidkullaabi ash'ariskullaabiyyahkullabi asharislafdhiyyahlater ash'arisliquormarifahmetaphysicsmicro madrasamuhammad abduhmuhammad anwar shah al-kashmirimuhammad fahmimuhammad sa'eed ramadan al-butimuhdathmujassimahmurakkabmushabbihahmutafalsifahmutakallimoonmu'tazilahnadhrnaqd al-tadmuriyyahnaruijinaseehah dhahabiyyahneo-hanbalisneo-platonismnihaayat ul-iqdaamnizar hammadinuh ha mim kellernuh kellernur uz zamaan institutenuzoolpersonal developmentphiladelphian jahmite ash'arisphiladelphian jahmitesphilophilosophersplatopseudo-hanbalisqadi abdul-jabbarquraanquranqu'ranqur'anqur'an creationistsridhaariyadh al-saaliheenrizqullah al-tamimisaalimiyyahsabeanssaeed foudahsaeed foudah sa'id foudahsaint worshipsalafiyyahsawtsayyid qutbseeking ilmself awarenessself helpshafaa'ahshahrastaanishahrastanisifaatsifaat dhaatiyyahsifaat fi'liyyahsifat fi'liyyahsifat khabariyyahsubstancesumaniyyahtabyin kadhib al-muftaritafweedtaj al-din al-subkitajseemtajsimtakaafu' al-adillahtakyeeftamtheeltaqi ad-din an-nabahanitaqiuddin al-nabhanitarkeebtashbeehta'teelta'weeltawhidtawhid al-ibaadahtawhid al-ibadahtawhid al-uloohiyyahtawhid al-uluhiyyahta'wilthe clinicthe quranthe thronetheologiansthomas aquinasthronetop tipsuluwwundercover ash'arisvoicewahhabiwahhabisyahyaa bin ammaaryusuf al-qaradawiyusuf an-nabahani
Copyright © 2017 . All rights reserved. RSSTagsPrivacyLegal and Terms of UseSitemap